Expert-Led Governance

Model-Assisted Analysis. Expert-Verified Findings.

POLLi® combines model-assisted vegetation analysis with Subject Matter Expert review, keeping findings connected to source imagery so they can be inspected, corrected, and used with appropriate context.

Governance, By Design

POLLi® helps turn expert knowledge into a reusable evidence foundation, supporting useful results today and informed improvements over time.

A review view in the POLLi platform showing an aerial map with marked areas near water, each outlined for expert analysis.

A reviewer's view inside POLLi®: model-assisted findings, outlined for inspection against the source imagery.

Review Grounded in Evidence

POLLi® keeps model-assisted findings linked to their source images. Reviewers can inspect what was captured and accept, reject, or correct findings where appropriate.

This connection supports a more traceable record of observed conditions while keeping human judgment in the process. Model outputs assist review; their suitability depends on the imagery, target vegetation, and conditions for which they have been evaluated.

Preserve Knowledge. Support Improvement.

Reviewed imagery and annotations can support future model development and validation, helping organizations retain what they have learned as team needs and analytical methods change.

Useful vegetation models begin with clearly defined questions and suitable training data. POLLi® supports developing annotated imagery datasets around specific monitoring objectives, with Subject Matter Experts helping define the targets and review the examples used for model development.

Models can help locate and characterize vegetation visible in imagery. Expert review helps determine whether those findings are useful for the intended purpose and where corrections or further model development are needed.

Expertise shapes the analysis, not the other way around.

POLLi® gives your Subject Matter Experts a faster, more consistent way to review model-assisted findings, so their judgment stays central to every decision, and every review adds to a more durable evidence record.